Home » Optional Protocol to CEDAW » Communications procedure » What are the inadmissibility criteria under art. 4.2 of the OP CEDAW? » The communication is “not sufficiently substantiated”
Inadmissibility criteria - the communication “not sufficiently substantiated”
The communication might be found not sufficiently substantiated if:
▪ the presentation of the facts is too general and not linked to the situation of the victim/victims of the violation and the specific harm she or they suffered;
▪ the information on the violation is not backed up with factual information and documents which make the allegation credible.
Therefore, the communication should include the detailed description of the facts supporting the claim: the dates, the identity of actors responsible for the violations as well as the description of the impact the violation has had on the victim’s situation. It should also provide documents illustrating the case and the process of exhausting the domestic remedies (e.g. medical documentation, statements of the witnesses, court documents).
This toolkit was prepared by KARAT Coalition thanks to the support of OXFAM Novib.
KARAT wishes to thank our partner IWRAW Asia Pacific for sharing with us its expertise and materials. Special thanks go to Lisa Pusey for her input and comments as well as to Karolina Siudak for her contribution to the text.