Inadmissibility criteria - facts that are subject to the communication occurred before the OP CEDAW came into force for the State concerned
It might be difficult to determine when the facts that started prior to the ratification of the Optional Protocol will be considered as continuing since decisions of human rights bodies have not provided clear guidance on that. However, such continuation undoubtedly occurs if the violation is reaffirmed by some decision or other act after the Optional Protocol enters into force.
This toolkit was prepared by KARAT Coalition thanks to the support of OXFAM Novib.
KARAT wishes to thank our partner IWRAW Asia Pacific for sharing with
us its expertise and materials. Special thanks go to Lisa Pusey for her input
and comments as well as to Karolina Siudak for her contribution to the text.
copyright 2009 webreklama.pl www.karat.org
